Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Christopher Grief v. Mark Williams
as 20-3946
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK K. WILLIAMS, Warden, F.C.I. Elkton
Defendant:
D. K. WILLIAMS, In her official capacity as Warden at FCI Danbury in Connecticut, HERMAN QUAY, Warden, in his official capacity and KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Warden of MDC Brooklyn, sued in her official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GRIEF
Jamison v. Warden, F.C.I. Elkton
as 1:2019cv00789
Petitioner:
James Jamison
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2017cv02131
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Walker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Faciltiy F.C.I. Elkton, Steven Merlak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Mays v. Steven Merlak, et al
as 16-4030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER MAYS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN MERLAK, Warden, F.C.I. ELKTON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR and BOP NE REGIONAL OFFICE DIRECTOR
Emanual Cook v. Dennis Orr, et al
as 14-4200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANUAL COOK, aka Emanuel Cook
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DENNIS ORR and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, F.C.I. Elkton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02126
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Simpson v. F.C.I. Elkton et al
as 4:2014mc00065
Petitioner:
Kenneth Simpson
Respondent:
F.C.I. Elkton, Pamela Steiner and JC Hayes
Edington v. F.C.I. Elkton
as 4:2013cv00129
Petitioner:
Jeremy R. Edington
Respondent:
Warden F.C.I. Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. F.C.I. Elkton Warden Farley
as 4:2012cv01052
Petitioner:
Javier G. Hernandez
Respondent:
F.C.I. Elkton Warden Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
