Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Esparza v. FanDuel Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01853
Plaintiff:
Miguel Esparza
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 pa Right to Privacy Act
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. BDG Media, Inc., et al.
as 5:2018cv03571
Plaintiff:
PersonalWeb Technologies LLC and Level 3 Communications LLC
Defendant:
BDG Media, Inc. , Blue Apron, LLC, Centaur Media USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al v. FanDuel Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv03582
Plaintiff:
PersonalWeb Technologies LLC and Level 3 Communications LLC
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. and FanDuel Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In Re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al
as 5:2018md02834
Defendant:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al, Airbnb, Inc., Stitchfix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lee Sobel v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03106
Defendant:
Does and Fanduel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lee Sobel
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00801
Plaintiff:
CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games LLC and Interactive Games Limited
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Peck v. Draftkings, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00127
Defendant:
Draftkings, Inc. and Fanduel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fernando Delgado et al v. FanDuel Inc et al
as 2:2015cv09907
Plaintiff:
Fernando Delgado and Ronald S. Randle
Defendant:
Does, FanDuel Ltd and FanDuel, Inc.
David Coleman v. Fanduel Inc et al
as 2:2015cv09876
Plaintiff:
David Coleman
Defendant:
Does and Fanduel Inc
Daniel Hale v. DraftKings Inc, et al
as 8:2015cv01879
Defendant:
DraftKings Inc and Fanduel Inc
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hale
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
