Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Farrell-Cooper Mining v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7061
Plaintiff - Appellant: FARRELL-COOPER MINING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Farrell-Cooper Mining Company v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00012
Plaintiff: Farrell-Cooper Mining Company
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior , Sally M. Jewell , Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, DIANE REECE, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Defendant - Appellee: AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 14-7010
Defendant / Appellee: SHIELDS OPERATING, INC., an Arkansas corporation, STEPHENS PRODUCTION COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, BRAZIL CREEK MINERALS, INC., an Oklahoma corporation and others
Defendant: BISHOP TRUCKING, an Oklahoma corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENNETT TANKSLEY, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, CHARLES TACKETT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages, HERMAN TOLBERT, individually and as representative for those seeking redress for damages and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Petitioner: WILLIAM REECE, DIANE REECE, HERMAN TOLBERT and others
Respondent: AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Respondent: HANNA OIL & GAS COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ENERVEST OPERATING, LLC and others
Petitioner: DIANE REECE, WILLIAM REECE, SUSAN HOLMES and others
Reece et al v. AES Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00457
Defendant: Star Bulk, MMHF, LLC, SEECO, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Bill Reece, Bennett Tanksley, Charles Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Farrell-Cooper Mining Company v. US Department of the Interior, et al
as 12-7048
Plaintiff - Appellee: FARRELL-COOPER MINING COMPANY
Defendant-Cross-Claimant - Appellant: OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF MINES
Defendant Cross-Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, KEN SALAZAR, as the Secretary of U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Farrell-Cooper Mining Company v. US Department of the Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-7045
Plaintiff - Appellant: FARRELL-COOPER MINING COMPANY
Defendant-Cross-Claimant - Appellee: OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF MINES
Defendant Cross-Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, KEN SALAZAR, as the Secretary of U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Farrell-Cooper Mining Company v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00428
Plaintiff: Farrell-Cooper Mining Company
Defendant: Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement, Ken Salazar, Joseph Pizarchik and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?