Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pulse Health Services et al v. FDIC-R et al
as 4:2020cv00048
Defendant:
FDIC-R and JP Morgan Chase Bank N A
Plaintiff:
E.W. Johnson and Pulse Health Services
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Martinez v. Compass Bank as Successor to FDIC as Receiver for Guaranty Bank et al
as 4:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Ludivina Martinez
Defendant:
RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, Compass Bank as Successor to FDIC as Receiver for Guaranty Bank and Capitol Mortgage Bankers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor in Interest from the FDIC as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Allen W. Scott and Shelly L. Scott
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Successor in Interest from the FDIC as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla et al v. First National Bank, Edinburg et al
as 5:2013cv01153
Defendant:
Federal Depository Ins. Corp. (FDIC), First National Bank, Edinburg, Robert Gandy and others
Plaintiff:
HTG Real Property Management, and All Related Entities, et al. and Mauro T. Padilla, III
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Williams et al v. Directors Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Directors Mortgage Company, Does 1-10 and others
Notice Only Party:
FDIC
Plaintiff:
Lela Williams and Losano Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Baldwin v. OneWest Bank et al
as 3:2011cv02677
Plaintiff:
Bettie L Baldwin
Defendant:
OneWest Bank, FDIC and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
v. FDIC
as 7:2009cv00301
Defendant:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Glenn v. Carter et al
as 6:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Glenn
Defendant:
Mary L. Carter and IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
Intervenor Defendant:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
