Cases 71 - 80 of 647
Russell Lukas v. FCC
as 20-5082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Russell DeWayne Lukas
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Nalini Kapur, et al v. FCC
as 20-1048
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Appellant:
Rishi Kapnr, Ravi Kapur and Nalini Kapur
Environmental Health Trust, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1025
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Petitioner:
Consumers for Safe Cell Phones, Theodora Scarato, Environmental Health Trust and others
National Lifeline Association v. FCC, et al
as 20-1006
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
National Lifeline Association
Tri-County Telephone Ass'n v. FCC, et al
as 20-1003
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
Tri-County Telephone Association, Inc.
Communications Workers of Amer v. USA, et al
as 19-1254
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Appellant:
Communications Workers of America
Wide Voice, LLC, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1244
Petitioner:
Wide Voice, LLC, HDPSTN, LLC, d/b/a HD Tandem and CarrierX, LLC
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Great Lakes Communication Corp, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1233
Petitioner:
Sipmeeting, LLC, Northern Valley Communications, LLC, Great Lakes Communication Corp. and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
City of Chicago, Illinois, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1226
Petitioner:
King County, Washington, City of St. Paul, MN, City of Olympia, Washington and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
