Cases 61 - 70 of 101
U.S. Telepacific Corp. v. FCC, et al
as 12-70282
Petitioner:
U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORP.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
North County Comm Corp v. FCC, et al
as 12-70252
Petitioner:
NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Herring Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 11-73134
Petitioner:
HERRING BROADCASTING, INC., DBA Wealth TV
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Access Humboldt v. FCC, et al
as 11-72849
Petitioner:
ACCESS HUMBOLDT
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Warren Havens v. FCC, et al
as 10-72606
Petitioner:
WARREN C. HAVENS
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Warren Havens v. FCC
as 10-72607
Petitioner:
WARREN C. HAVENS
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Dish Network Corporation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 10-16666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION and DISH NETWORK, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, JULIUS GENACHOWSKI, MICHAEL J. COPPS and others
Skybridge Spectrum Foundation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 10-71808
Petitioner:
SKYBRIDGE SPECTRUM FOUNDATION, a Delaware Nonprofit Corporation, INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION & MONITORING WIRELESS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, V2G LLC, A Delaware limited liability company and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Warren Havens v. FCC
as 10-71718
Petitioner:
WARREN C. HAVENS
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Minority Television Project, I v. FCC, et al
as 09-17311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINORITY TELEVISION PROJECT, INC.
Intervenor:
LINCOLN BROADCASTING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
