Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WILLIAMS v. CHIEF JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02175
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BINION WILLIAMS v. WELLS FARGO
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
DR. FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS and FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WILLIAMS v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BERYL A. HOWELL and RUDOLPH CONTRERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
WILLIAMS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv03654
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv02993
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BINION WILLIAMS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv01791
Plaintiff:
FELICIA BINION WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
