Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sergio Sanchez-Chavez v. Felicia Ponce
as 22-55576
Petitioner / Appellant:
SERGIO SANCHEZ-CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Edgar Vasquez, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 22-55563
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Petitioner:
LANCE AARON WILSON and MAURICE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden and MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Edgar Vasquez v. USA, et al
as 22-55501
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, FBOP Director / Central Office and others
Christopher Miller v. Felicia Ponce
as 22-55374
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. Felicia Ponce
as 21-55877
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Carl Bennett v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 21-55679
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCOS AIRD, Staff Physician Assistant, individual, FELICIA PONCE, Warden, Terminal Island FCI, individuals, EVELYN CASTRO, M.D. / C.D., Staff Physician, individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Lance Wilson, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 20-55760
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE SMITH, LANCE AARON WILSON and EDGAR VASQUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Samuel Cohen v. Felicia Ponce
as 19-56527
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL COHEN, AKA Mouli Cohen
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Martin Czeck v. Felicia Ponce
as 19-55789
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBERT CZECK
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Michael Johnson v. Felicia Ponce
as 19-55715
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL K. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
