Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARTINEZ v. JAZZY NAILS AND SPA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
YASIRIS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JAZZY NAILS AND SPA LLC, ABC CORPORATION (fictitious entity) and XYZ CORPORATION (fictitious entity)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CANTIELLO v. HARBOR FREIGHTS TOOLS et al
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN CANTIELLO
Defendant:
HARBOR FREIGHTS TOOLS, JOHN DOES I-X (FICTITIOUS NAMES) and ABC CORPS. I-X (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CRAIG et al v. MR. COFFEE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04379
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CRAIG and ALICIA CRAIG
Defendant:
MR. COFFEE LLC, SUNBEAM PRODUCTS INC d/b/a JARDEN CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS, NEWELL BRANDS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KALIHER v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03494
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL KALIHER
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART, US., WAL-MART FULFILLMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WASHINGTON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2020cv06548
Defendant:
LEHIGH VALLEY PHYSICIAN GROUP, LVPG-FAMILY MEDICINE, JOHN/JNAE DOE PROVIDERS A-Z (MUTIPLE FICTITIOUS PERSONS) and others
Plaintiff:
DESIREE WASHINGTON and FREDRICK WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
