Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bailey v. Frantz et al
as 3:2016cv01917
Petitioner:
Edward Earl Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole, Judge Frantz, Sandra Rorick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2014cv01615
Defendant:
Mrs. Kimberlee Ackeemoto, Mr. Drake Durham, Mrs. Julie E. Frantz and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Edwards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards Junior v. Frantz et al
as 3:2014cv01378
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Edwards Junior
Defendant:
Honorable Ms. Julie E. Frantz, Honorable Ms. Skye Kelly and Ms. Annamarie Shoen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Multnoma County et al
as 3:2013cv01156
Defendant:
Hon Julie Frantz, Gayle Kvernhand, Multnoma County and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Emmingham v. Stayton et al
as 3:2010cv00502
Petitioner:
John Eric Emmingham
Respondent:
Judge Julie E. Frantz and Dan Stayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frantz v. Washington Mutual Bank, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03072
Plaintiff:
Thomas Frantz
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Dansby v. Fellows et al
as 1:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Yancey Dansby
Defendant:
Lorri Fellows and Julie E. Frantz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Nooth et al
as 3:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Young
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, Max Williams, Hardy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClinton v. Frantz
as 3:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Tyrone McClinton
Defendant:
Julie Frantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
