Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Furminator, Inc. v. Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp. et al
as 4:2011cv01756
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Rolf C. Hagen, Inc. and Rolf C. Hagen (USA) Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Furminator, Inc. v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv01941
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Jim Brown, Michael Marinescu, Michael Pupko and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Furminator, Inc. v. Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01829
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc., SWE, Inc., Kefeng Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Furminator, Inc. v. Sharkshnas et al
as 4:2010cv00860
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Jo Ann Sharkshnas, Michael Sharkshnas and Ann Lindon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Furminator, Inc. v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al
as 4:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Central Garden & Pet Company and Four Paws Products Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Furminator, Inc. v. Coastal Pet Products Inc.
as 4:2010cv00375
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Coastal Pet Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Furminator, Inc. v. Andis Company
as 4:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc.
Defendant:
Andis Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Furminator, Inc. v. Munchin, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
Furminator, Inc., Furminator, Inc., Furminator, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Munchin, Inc. and Kim Laube & Co., Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Munchin, Inc. and Kim Laube & Co., Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Furminator, Inc., Furminator, Inc., Furminator, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Furminator, Inc., et al. v. Munchkin Inc., et al.
as 4:2008cv00367
Plaintiff:
Munchkin, Inc. and Kim Laube & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Furminator, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
