Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mywan D. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities et al
as 1:2023cv05346
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Dr. Nicole Azores-Gococo, Jamie Schickler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Sheriff Office Dekalb County Georgia, The DeKalb County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAIR v. LADD et al
as 5:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
BRETT LADD, PUBLIC DEFENDER RASHAWN CLARK and TERRI L LARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIR v. WHITE et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
HEAD NURSE WHITE, NURSE HENRY, NURSE LESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIR v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
INVESTIGATOR RANDY HOWARD, INVESTIGATOR TENNELL, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAIR v. WHITE et al
as 5:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
NURSE WHITE, MAJOR BRYANT, SERGEANT GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv02488
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Phinia Aten, Robert F. Mumford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Mumford et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Demonty L. Fair
Defendant:
Rockdale County Superior Court and Robert F. Mumford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
