Cases 31 - 40 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00655
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00289
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Palmer v. Fannie Mae
as 17-2867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felicia Palmer, FKA Felicia Dudley
Defendant - Appellee:
Fannie Mae, Federal National Mortgage Association
Demos v. General Electric Company
as 17-1954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
General Electric Company, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: John Demos, Jr.
as 17-699
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
General Electric Company, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and others
Demos v. General Electric et al
as 2:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
General Electric, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mac and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Fannie Mae v. Valastro
as 1:2016cv06305
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe and Nicholas B. Valastro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Deforest v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv08176
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Deforest
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Federal National Mortgage Association as Trustee For Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2006-123 and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallousis v. Federal National Mortgage Association as Trustee for Securitzed Trust Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2003-74 et al
as 1:2016cv07974
Plaintiff:
Sarah Gallousis
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association as Trustee for Securitzed Trust Fannie Mae Remic Trust 2003-74 and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
