Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Westlake, et al v Miller, et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Doug Farris, Cattoor Livestock Roundup, Inc., Chris Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Westlake and American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farris v. USA
as 2:2018cv00284
Petitioner:
Connie S. Farris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Farris v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00761
Defendant:
Kim Babers, Willett and Brian E. Williams
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Farris
SDCC:
Johnson Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. State of Nevada DOC et al
as 3:2016cv00404
Defendant:
Tonapha Camp, Cox, Eric Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. State of Nevada DOC et al
as 2:2016cv01583
Defendant:
Tonapha Camp, Cox, Eric Gomez and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. USA
as 2:2016cv01257
Petitioner:
Connie S. Farris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edwards v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv00138
Defendant:
Alverez, James Cox, Farris and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. CCDC et al
as 2:2010cv01448
Defendant:
CCDC, Holliday and Chris Lee Pennington
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Insight Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Invision Technology Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00283
Defendant:
Lyndle Farris and Invision Technology Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Insight Technology Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
