Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Nelson v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01378
Plaintiff:
Phillip Nelson
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as FedEx Home Delivery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Armijo v FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Jaime Loree Armijo
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hollister v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Marty Hollister
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swain v. Buel Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Swain
Defendant:
Buel Inc, Shane Garee, Littau Harvester Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Empey et al v. C R England, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
Sharron Empey and Delaney Empey
Defendant:
C R England, Inc. , Jonathan M. Reyes , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Handley et al
as 2:2015cv00075
Defendant:
David L Handley , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Alan W. Riley, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tonnie Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Salyards v. Sellers et al
as 1:2014cv01946
Plaintiff:
Christina Salyards
Defendant:
Frank A. Sellers, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and KBT Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Tucker
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc , FedEx Freight Inc and John P Friedel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
