Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Gorbey v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Brian J. Davis, Federal Bureau of Prisions, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Key v. Federal Bureau of Prisions et al
as 5:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dajuan Key
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions and Corlete Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blackmon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Nathanael Blackmon and Nathaniel Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Cheatham, et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Roy Cheatham, J. Taylor, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 5:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Berry Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. USP Coleman I et al
as 5:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
USP Coleman I, B. M. Antonelli, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratcliff v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2021cv00237
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Petitioner:
David Marc Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LaChase v. Former Warden et al
as 1:2020cv22918
Defendant:
Regional Director, Discipline Hearing Officer, Senior Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Charlton Edward LaChase
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00381
Defendant:
John Doe 6, M. Chaney, John/Jane Does 10, 11 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero-Carrascal v. Federal Bureau of Prisions
as 1:2017cv23057
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Romero-Carrascal
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
