Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Whiteman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2017cv01490
Petitioner:
Robert J. Whiteman, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Danbury and Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 3:2017cv00847
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crozier v. Community Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00480
Petitioner:
Ralph C. Crozier
Respondent:
Community Solutions, Inc., J. Hollingworth and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Danbury FCI et al
as 3:2014cv01769
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gonzalez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Danbury FCI and Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv01232
Plaintiff:
Jamie Booker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2014cv01178
Plaintiff:
Beverly Holland
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Madrid v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2012cv00532
Plaintiff:
Carmina Pando De Madrid
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv01257
Petitioner:
Mich'Quel Nolan
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Maureen Baird and CCM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Akande v. US Marshal Svc et al
as 3:2010cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jason Akande
Defendant:
US Marshal Svc, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Geoffrey Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlea v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv02051
Plaintiff:
Wendy Dunlea
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. L. Norwood, D. Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
