Cases 21 - 30 of 226
Clay v. Pingatore et al
as 3:2022cv50184
Plaintiff:
Gary Lebron Clay
Defendant:
K Pingatore, T Brewer, United States Department Of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waugh v. USA et al
as 3:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Waugh
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kathy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Morgan v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv50080
Plaintiff:
Jack William Morgan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Warden Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyde v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Hyde
Defendant:
USP Marion and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v Hill
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
William A White
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, Stacy Byram, Daniel Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bosaw v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Bosaw
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Correctional Center and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pace v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Roger Pace
Defendant:
USP Marion, Warden Sprout and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
King v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv01719
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander King
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul, Guy Pagli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv01699
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander King
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, N. Simpkins, S. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
