Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Martin v. Call et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
Matt Call and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharp v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2021cv00072
Petitioner:
Meiesha R. Sharp
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Jemison v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00206
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Hector Joyner
Petitioner:
Dexter Lo'Rantho Jemison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Raymer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2020cv00332
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Hanna Raymer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lawson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Trust Fund of U.S.P. - Big Sandy, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. State of Kentucky et al
as 4:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Cameron
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Henderson County Detention Center, Amy Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00270
Petitioner:
Andrew Fields, III
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dewald v. McCallister et al
as 4:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
David E. Dewald, II
Defendant:
McCallister, Kincaid, Henderson County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2011cv00390
Petitioner:
Keith Douglas Phillips
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
