Cases 1 - 10 of 12
George Dernis, et al v. Amos Financial, et al
as 16-1790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE DERNIS, husband and MARIA DERNIS, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
AMOS FINANCIAL, an Illinois limited liability company, PREMIER BANK, an Illinois bank, ZULFIKAR ESMAIL, Husband and others
Patrick Rayburn v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, et al
as 14-2744
Plaintiff:
Golden Eagle Investments Co. LLC, Rayburn Land Development, LLC, Ashley Rayburn and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrick Rayburn
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri and CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1, LLC
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 13-3498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd, doing business as Greater Missouri Builders
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, MO and CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1, LLC, as substituted party for Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd, doing business as Greater Missouri Builders, Paul Campbell and Sarajane Campbell
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1, LLC, as substituted party for Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
Greater Midwest Builders v. FDIC, et al
as 13-2309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd, doing business as Greater Missouri Builders
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
Paul Campbell, Sarajane Campbell and Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd, Greater Missouri Builders
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, MO and CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1, LLC, as substituted party for Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
CADC/RADC Venture 2011-1, LLC, as substituted party for Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
Michael's Market, Inc. et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank
as 1:2012cv09410
Plaintiff:
Michael's Market, Inc. , 2820-30 North Cicero, LLC , 4815 W. Wolfram, LLC and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Dernis v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02856
Plaintiff:
George D. Dernis
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank , Dr. Zulfikar Esmail , Shamim Esmail and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Dittmer Properties v. FDIC, et al
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dittmer Properties, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri, Cathy Richards, Successor Trustee of the Peters Family Trust u.t.a. Restated September 27, 2007, Assignee of a Fifty Percent General Partnership Interest in Barkley Center General Partnership Derived Origin and Cathy Richards
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd. d/b/a Greater Missouri Builders v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank Jefferson City MO
as 2:2011cv04225
Plaintiff:
Greater Midwest Builders, Ltd. d/b/a Greater Missouri Builders
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank Jefferson City MO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
City of Wildwood, Missouri v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri
as 2:2011cv04177
Plaintiff:
City of Wildwood, Missouri
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
City of O'Fallon, Missouri v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri
as 2:2011cv04138
Plaintiff:
City of O'Fallon, Missouri
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Premier Bank, Jefferson City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
