Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Freeman Cave v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 20-1017
Defendant / Appellee:
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREEMAN H. CAVE
Velma Townsend v. Federal National Mortgage
as 13-2380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VELMA TOWNSEND
Plaintiff:
LANDON TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae, SAMUEL L. WHITE, P.C. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Dale Butts v. Federal National Mortgage Asso
as 13-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE L. BUTTS, as Register of Deeds of Beaufort County, South Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JOHN HOPKINS, as Register of Deeds of Richland County, South Carolina, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
GAIL LANEY, as Register of Deeds of Orangeburg County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMES B. HIERS, as Register of Deeds and Clerk of Court of Bamberg County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RHONDA MCELVEEN, as Register of Mesne Conveyances and Clerk of Court of Barnwell County, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae, a federally chartered private corporation and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a/k/a Freddie Mac, a federally chartered private corporation
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Conservator of Federal National Mortgage Association; Conservator of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Elayne Wolf v. Federal National Mortgage
as 11-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELAYNE WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a/k/a Fannie Mae, BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP and PROFESSIONAL FORECLOSURE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
