Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01041
Counter Defendant:
Olymbec USA LLC, Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc., Closed Loop Glass Solutions, LLC and others
Defendant:
Dynamic Lifestyles Innovations Inc., Vintage Tech, LLC, Robert A. Erie and others
Cross Defendant:
E-World Recyclers, LLC, Geep Holdings Inc., IMS Electronics Recycling, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
American Retroworks, Inc. and LG Electronics USA Inc
Counter Claimant:
Geep USA Inc., Complete Recycling Solutions, LLC, RMG Enterprise, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Kathryn R Gugle
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00783
Cross Defendant:
Kuusakoski US LLC, Potomac Ecycle, LLC, Eworks Electronics Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries, Inc., Brent Benham, David Cauchi and others
Counter Claimant:
Kuusakoski Glass Recycling LLC and Micro Center Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Garrison Southfield Park LLC
Cross Claimant:
Rochester Computer Recycling & Recovery, LLC and Dynamic Lifestyle Innovations Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Kathryn R Gugle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Isbell v. Merlak et al
as 4:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Israel Carl Isbell
Defendant:
Steve Merlak, Federal Correctional Institution-Elkton, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Borazanian v. Federal Prison Industries et al
as 4:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
Donald Borazanian
Defendant:
Federal Prison Industries and Reed Technology and Information Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv01475
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
