Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Chapman v. Fellowes Inc
as 1:2021cv01413
Defendant:
Fellowes Inc doing business as Fellowes Brands
Plaintiff:
Percy Chapman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Otter Products, LLC et al v. Fellowes, Inc.,
as 1:2019cv06195
Plaintiff:
Otter Products, LLC and TreeFrog Developments, Inc.
Defendant:
Fellowes, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fellowes Inc. v. Fintie LLC
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
Fellowes Inc.
Defendant:
Fintie LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fellowes Inc. v. New United Office Equipments Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv10273
Plaintiff:
Fellowes Inc.
Defendant:
SimplyGlobo, Inc., New United Office Equipments Co. Ltd. and New United Office Equipment USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fellowes, Inc. v. Intelli-Zone et al
as 1:2011cv08634
Plaintiff:
Fellowes, Inc.
Defendant:
Intelli-Zone and American Binding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fellowes, Inc. v. ACCO Brands Corp.
as 1:2011cv08148
Plaintiff:
Fellowes, Inc.
Defendant:
ACCO Brands Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Fellowes, Inc. v. Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. et al
as 1:2011cv06565
Plaintiff:
Fellowes, Inc.
Defendant:
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Fellowes Inc v. Fellowes Business Machines (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.
as 1:2011cv06289
Plaintiff:
Fellowes Inc
Defendant:
Changzhou Xinrui Fellowes Office Equipment Co. Ltd. a/k/a Fellowes Manufacturing (Changzhou) Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fellowes, Inc. v. Michilin Prosperity Company, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv06192
Plaintiff:
Fellowes, Inc.
Defendant:
Michilin Prosperity Company, Ltd. and Intek America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
