Cases 1 - 10 of 90
SPOT FREIGHT, INC. v. H LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
SPOT FREIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
H LOGISTICS, INC. and AMERICAN INTER-FIDELITY EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Banas v. Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
as 1:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Anthony Banas
Defendant:
Midwest Fidelity Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Peller v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peller
Defendant:
Anthony K. Anderson, Ann C. Berzin, Laurie Brlas and others
Williams et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams, Lucy Parsons Labs, Daniel Ortiz and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David O'Neal Brown, Nicholas Evangelides and others
Petitioner:
SoundThinking, Inc.
Woodard v. Morgan Fidelity Associates Inc,
as 1:2022cv06634
Plaintiff:
Antionette Woodard
Defendant:
Morgan Fidelity Associates Inc,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Automotive Keys Group, LLC v. Sanchez, et al
as 1:2022cv04930
Plaintiff:
Automotive Keys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Fidel Sanchez and Electronic Access Specialists, Inc. doing business as d/b/a Southern Lock and Supply Co.
United States of America v. Rivchin
as 3:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Rivchin
Garnishee:
Fidelity Investments
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
