Cases 1 - 10 of 732
Fields v. State Attorney's Office for the Ninth Judicial Circuit et al
as 6:2024cv00879
Petitioner:
Charlie C. Fields
Respondent:
Warden, Orange County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Circuit Tenth Court Polk County
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jamil Fields
Defendant:
Circuit Tenth Court Polk County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Polk County Clerk of Court
as 8:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Jamil Fields
Defendant:
Polk County Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Assistant District Attorney et al
as 6:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Fields
Defendant:
Assistant District Attorney and Deputy Justin Valutsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on denials of applications for naturalization
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
