Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Chacon v. CACH, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv03010
Plaintiff:
Leda Chacon
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Evangelista v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01378
Plaintiff:
Francelina Evangelista
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martinez v. CACH, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00633
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Martinez
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Griego v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv08657
Plaintiff:
Ruth Griego
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STAMBAUGH v. FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01185
Defendant:
FINANCIAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., LVNV FUNDING, LLC and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. STAMBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parrish v. CACH, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv03549
Plaintiff:
Scarlett Parrish
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Biddix v. CACH, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Jerry Biddix
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McKee v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv06206
Plaintiff:
Ollie McKee
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC, LVNV Funding, LLC and Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hardiman v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2010cv05328
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Hardiman
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership, Financial Recovery Services, Inc., LVNV Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
