Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Alexis Leclerc v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2023cv08023
Plaintiff:
Alexis Leclerc
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Arec D. Simeri v. FNBO Holdings LLC
as 2:2023cv04853
Plaintiff:
Arec D Simeri
Defendant:
FNBO Holdings LLC doing business as First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lewis v. First National Bank of Omaha et al
as 4:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Cornelus E. Lewis
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rotkin v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Rotkin
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Michael Ryan v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 5:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2021cv00088
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sapaden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2021at00037
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sapaden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Helbock v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 3:2020cv09500
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Jarron Helbock
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Donna Jackson v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2020cv01295
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Plaintiff:
Donna Jackson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
