Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Bourne v. First State Insurance Company
as 5:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Bourne
Defendant:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Davis v. First State Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Davis
Defendant:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Roberts v. First State Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Terry T. Roberts
Defendant:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Fox v. First State Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Ava C. Fox
Defendant:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Williams v. First State Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Rayford James Williams
Defendant:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bourne v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Bourne
Defendant:
3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Eastman v. Mississippi Valley Silica Company et al
as 5:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Rutha Eastman
Defendant:
Mississippi Valley Silica Company
Garnishee:
First State Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tabor v. George Engine Co Inc et al
as 2:2009cv05896
Plaintiff:
Judy Tabor, Judy Tabor and Judy Tabor
Defendant:
George Engine Co Inc, Louis Frierson, Louis Bartels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 (b) Proceeding arising/related to case under title 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03610
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03608
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
