Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Tim Neff, et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 14-3837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIM L. NEFF and BOBBIE K. NEFF
Defendant - Appellee:
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
In re: Paul A. Geraci
as 14-8019
Debtor:
In re: PAUL A. GERACI
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY M. KELLNER and PAUL A. GERACI
Defendant - Appellant:
FIRST OHIO BANC & LENDING, INC. and FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., CAROLYN RICE and SHELLY L. GERACI
Hartwick v. Flagstar Bank FSB
as 5:2013cv14186
Plaintiff:
Keith E Hartwick
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv10042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tim Neff, et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 12-3732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIM L. NEFF and BOBBIE K. NEFF
Defendant - Appellee:
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB
Neff et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 2:2011cv01136
Plaintiff:
Tim L Neff and Bobbie K Neff
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Fadil et al v. A New Start Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10181
Plaintiff:
Wasim Fadil and Sonia Fadil
Defendant:
A New Start Mortgage, Inc., Trott & Trott, P.C., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Great Florida Bank
as 2:2010mc51255
Petitioner:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Respondent:
Great Florida Bank
Flagstar Bank, FSB v. Choi et al
as 2:2009cv13990
Plaintiff:
Flagstar Bank, FSB and Flagstar Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Wan Ming Liu and Chae Yong Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
