Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thomas et al v. Orozco-Pineda et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Randolph Thomas and Bridgette Palmatierre
Defendant:
Jorge Orozco-Pineda, Henry Lopez-Calleja, Food Haulers Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Autry v. Medina et al
as 1:2021cv03833
Defendant:
Jem Trucking LLC,, Jose J. Medina and Food Haulers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nia Autry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv
Abreu et al v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv01641
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo A. Rodriguez Abreu, Martha Yvette Diaz and Jose Alberto Castill Abreu
Defendant:
Wakefern Food Corp., Food Haulers Inc,, Oscar A. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
OREBEK, et al. v. FOOD HAULERS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06088
Defendant:
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP. and FOOD HAULERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING et al v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04933
Plaintiff:
CHERYL KING , ROBERT KING and STEVEN SMILOWITZ
Defendant:
WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION , FOOD HAULERS, INC. , NATIONAL TRANSPORT SERVICES CO., INC. and others
Movant:
NATIONAL TRANSPORT SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAULK v. FERRER-FIGUEROA et al
as 2:2010cv04830
Plaintiff:
SHARON FAULK
Defendant:
LUIS R. FERRER-FIGUEROA , LUIS R. FERRER-REYES , V-ANN TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAULK v. FERRER-FIGUEROA et al
as 2:2010cv02793
Plaintiff:
SHARON FAULK
Defendant:
LUIS R. FERRER-FIGUEROA , LUIS R. FERRER-REYES , V-ANN TRUCKING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION et al v. STATE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTORS, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv03804
Plaintiff:
WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION, FOOD HAULERS, INC. and NATIONAL TRANSPORT SERVICES COMPANY
Defendant:
STATE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTORS, LLC and STATE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
