Cases 11 - 17 of 17
DEABREU et al v. NOVASTAR HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2011cv02114
Plaintiff:
LOUIS PIERRE DEABREU and RENEE LAVINIA DEABREU
Defendant:
MICHIGAN FIDELITY ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO BANK, TIMOTHY J. SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC. , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
USA v. 2 North Adams St., Quincy, FL, et al
as 10-5168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
2 North Adams Street, Quincy, Florida 32351, 205 Cactus Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32304, Approximately $634,266.13 in U.S. Funds Previously Deposited at the Bartow County Bank, Account 059-602, In the Name of Golden Panda Ad Builder and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FOOTE
as 1:2009mc00512
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
DAVONE FOOTE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2 NORTH ADAMS STREET, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351 et al
as 1:2008cv02205
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
2 NORTH ADAMS STREET, QUINCY, FLORIDA 32351, 205 CACTUS STREET, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32304, APPROXIMATELY $634,266.13 IN U.S. FUNDS PREVIOUSLY DEPOSITED AT THE BARTOW COUNTY BANK, ACCOUNT 059-602, IN THE NAME OF GOLDEN PANDA AD BUILDER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
KEEPS EAGLE, et al v. VENEMAN, et al
as 1:1999cv03119
Plaintiff:
GEORGE B. KEEPS EAGLE , LUTHER CRASCO , JOHN FREDERICKS and others
Defendant:
ANN M. VENEMAN , MIKE JOHANNS and THOMAS J. VILSACK
Movant:
PHIL GIVENS , RICHARD L. HOWELL , JOE BYRD and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LABATTE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
