Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Derecktor Florida, Inc. v. a 2003 build 67-foot Bertram motor yacht et al
as 0:2024cv60427
Plaintiff:
Derecktor Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
a 2003 build 67-foot Bertram motor yacht, Mazyer Hatami and Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Derecktor Florida, Inc. v. A 1991 Model 132-Foot Heesen Motor Yacht Named ESPADA (Ex: MIRAGE) et al
as 0:2024cv60207
Plaintiff:
Derecktor Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
a 1991 Model 132-foot Heesen motor yacht named ESPADA (Ex: MIRAGE) and Mazyer "Mike" Hatami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
West v. M/V Exodus et al
as 1:2024cv20100
Plaintiff:
Roger West
Defendant:
M/V Exodus, a 88-foot Pershing yacht bearing Hull Identification Number IT-ADRP8812E303, Ex: Cayman Island Shipping Registry Official Number 745268, its engines, tackle, furniture, and appurtenances, Mess&Sea Marine Ltd. and M/V Exodus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Griffin v. Martin County et al
as 2:2023cv14222
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
Martin County, William D. Snyder, Brandon Greis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell et al v. SEYCHELLES LIMITED, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv61267
Plaintiff:
Sandra Caldwell and Nancy Newbold
Defendant:
Seychelles Limited, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Tammy Fisher, M/Y Slip Away (Ex: Triple Net), a 2000 92-foot Monte Fino motor yacht, Hull ID No. MFY92615K001 and USCG No. 1219930, engines, tackle, appurtenances including a 2003 26-foot Regulator tender, in rem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
JFS International Management, Inc. v. M/Y Casino Royale, a 2004 108-foot Sunseeker Predator, its engines, tackle, equipment, and furnishings, in rem et al
as 0:2023cv60737
Plaintiff:
JFS International Management, Inc. doing business as Marine Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Services
Defendant:
M/Y Casino Royale, a 2004 108-foot Sunseeker Predator, its engines, tackle, equipment, and furnishings, in rem and LE CHIFFRE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
SHM MARATHON, LLC v. M/V Knee Deep, a 30-foot home-built motor vessel, its engines, tackle furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem
as 4:2023cv10023
Plaintiff:
SHM MARATHON, LLC
Defendant:
M/V Knee Deep, a 30-foot home-built motor vessel, its engines, tackle furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
Rolly Marine Service Company v. M/Y WATER WORLD et al
as 1:2023cv21053
Plaintiff:
Rolly Marine Service Company
Defendant:
M/Y WATER WORLD, a 1999 45 foot Sea Ray 450 EB recreational Vessel, U.S. Coast Guard official number 1108667, HIN: SERP4576H900, her boats, engines, generators, tackle, rigging, apparel, furniture, fu, FUN BOAT RENTALS, LLC and M/Y WATER WORLD,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Derecktor Florida, Inc. v. 1991 Model 132-Foot Heesen motor yacht named Nygard (Ex: Mirage)et al
as 0:2023cv60435
Plaintiff:
Derecktor Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
a 1991 Model 132-Foot Heesen motor yacht named Nygard (Ex: Mirage), flagged in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, its engines, tackle, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem, YL Limited, in personam, 1991 Model 132-Foot Heesen motor yacht named Nygard (Ex: Mirage) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SHM LMC, LLC v. A 2001 Model 60-Foot Magnum Marine motor yacht bearing Hull Identification Number US-MAG60001D001, its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem et al
as 0:2023cv60381
Plaintiff:
SHM LMC, LLC d/b/a LAUDERDALE MARINE CENTER
Defendant:
A 2001 Model 60-Foot Magnum Marine motor yacht bearing Hull Identification Number US-MAG60001D001, its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem, Mazyer "Mike" Hatami, Mirage Yacht, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
