Cases 21 - 30 of 46
HOWARD v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 8:2012cv01631
Plaintiff:
Severn J. Howard and Karen Cannon
Defendant:
Inc Raymark Industries, Chrysler Corporation, Wagner Electric Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Preston v. Ford Motor Company
as 8:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Beverly K. Preston
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Huntington v. Ford Motor Company
as 8:2011cv03311
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roy Huntington
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Parran's Flooring Center, Inc. et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 8:2011cv01151
Plaintiff:
Parran's Flooring Center, Inc. and Parran Wilkinson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Petsche et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2011cv02314
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Petsche and Carolyn J. Petsche
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company , Key Safety Systems, Inc. and Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alston-Clark v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2011cv01120
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Alston-Clark
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Francis Scott Key Lincoln/Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Francis Scott Key Lincoln/Mercury, Inc.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rich Morton's Glen Burnie Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2010cv03656
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Rich Morton's Glen Burnie Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. and Bert Spriggs Motor Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randle v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2010cv03498
Plaintiff:
Kimberleigh Randle
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randle v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2010cv03475
Plaintiff:
Kimberleigh Randle
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
