Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins, et al.
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant:
JEANNE HIGGINS, Idaho Panhandle National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 24-1422
Plaintiff:
NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL, A nonprofit Washington corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, A federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KRISTIN BAIL, In her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, United States Forest Service
Central Oregon Wild Horse Coalition, et al. v. Vilsack, et al.
as 23-4260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTRAL OREGON WILD HORSE COALITION, a non-profit organization, GAYLE HUNT, an individual and MELINDA KESTLER, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, RANDY MOORE, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity, GLENN CASAMASSA, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity and others
Ohio Environmental Council v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 23-3795
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service, CARRIE GILBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Wayne National Forest and others
Patagonia Area Resource Alliance, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-16167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATAGONIA AREA RESOURCE ALLIANCE, ARIZONA MINING REFORM COALITION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and KERWIN S. DEWBERRY, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA STANDARD LLC and SOUTH32 HERMOSA, INC., AKA Arizona Minerals, Inc.
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. American Forest Resource Council, et al
as 23-35568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Nathan Gassman, et al
as 23-35567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant / Appellant:
NATHAN GASSMAN, District Ranger, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger District, CHAD BENSON, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest, KEITH LANNOM, Deputy Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service Region One and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, LINCOLN COUNTY and KOOTENAI FOREST STAKEHOLDERS COALITION
Kettle Range Conservation Group v. US Forest Service, et al
as 23-35548
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KETTLE RANGE CONSERVATION GROUP
Defendant / Appellant:
US FOREST SERVICE, GLENN CASAMASSA, Pacific Northwest Regional Forester, US Forest Service, RODNEY SMOLDON, Forest Supervisor, Colville National Forest and others
Wilderness Watch, et al. v. Jackson, et al.
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Watch, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Friends of the Clearwater and others
Defendant:
Forest Supervisor linda Jackson, Mary Farnsworth, U.S. Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Friends of the Clearwater v. Cheryl Probert, et al
as 23-35175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL F. PROBERT, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests and U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
