Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bowser v. Department of the Army, Fort A.P. Hill
as 23-2004
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BOWSER
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT A.P. HILL
FORT LEE COMMONWEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
FORT LEE COMMONWEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC and FORT LEE FAMILY HOUSING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AETC II PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
AETC II PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC and HUNT AETC II COMMUNITIES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
AIR FORCE ACADEMY MILITARY COMMUNITIES, LLC, HUNT SOUTHERN GROUP, LLC, BLB PRIVATIZED HOUSING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE OF FORT WAYNE ASSOCIATES I, LP v. USA
as 1:1997cv05839
Plaintiff:
CAMBRIDGE SQUARE OF FORT WAYNE ASSOCIATES I, LP
Defendant:
USA
A&D Auto Sales, Inc. v. US
as 13-5019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
A&D AUTO SALES, INC., ALLEY'S OF KINGSPORT, INC., ARCHER CHRYSLER JEEP WEST, INC. and others
Respondent:
COLONIAL DODGE, INC. and HOOVER CHRYSLER JEEP INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Amicus Curiae:
SPITZER MOTOR CITY, INC., SPITZER AUTOWORLD AKRON, LLC, SPITZER AUTOWORLD SHEFFIELD, LLC and others
FORTE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00214
Petitioner:
RUBY FORTE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
MSHIFT V DIGITAL INSIGHT
as 11-1057
Defendant-Appellee:
Busey Bank, Community Trust Bank, Dension State Bank and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
MShift, Inc.
FORT HOWARD SENIOR HOUSING ASSOCIATES, LLC, v. USA
as 1:2010cv00553
Plaintiff:
FORT HOWARD SENIOR HOUSING ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
FORT PECK TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2010cv00306
Plaintiff:
FORT PECK TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
