Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bishop v. Fort Belknap Tribe et al
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Kolton Bishop
Respondent:
Fort Belknap Tribe and Two Rivers Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lane v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Raven Lane
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Fort Peck Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Sierra Jackson
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Fort Peck Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Fort Peck Tribes et al
as 4:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
Fort Peck Tribes, B.I.A. and Fort Peck Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Fort Peck Tribal Jail
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ralph Hamilton
Defendant:
Fort Peck Tribal Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
as 4:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Howard Jones
Respondent:
Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lambert v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
as 4:2015cv00082
Petitioner:
Eileen Lambert
Respondent:
Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Buckles v. Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
as 4:2015cv00079
Petitioner:
Morris Buckles
Respondent:
Fort Peck Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. CIA/BIA Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
CIA/BIA Corrections, Fort Peck Corrections Department, Roosevelt County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Four Star v. Red Boy et al
as 4:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Corwin Dallas Four Star
Defendant:
Sean Red Boy, William Mercer, Lori Suek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
