Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kendall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Frances Louise Kendall
Defendant:
Commissioner Acting Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Van Buskirk v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Frances M. Van Buskirk
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Feagans-King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv03121
Plaintiff:
Frances Feagans-King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Van Buskirk v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv08035
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Frances M. Van Buskirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Doreen Frances Perkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rider, Frances v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Frances Rider
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abbott v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01811
Plaintiff:
Sherry Frances Abbott
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jaggars-Saucedo v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
Renee Elaine Frances Jaggars-Saucedo
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Frances Czarnecki v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-1815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCES M. CZARNECKI
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Stockton v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01239
Plaintiff:
Frances Stockton
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
