Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gambino vs. Napolitano, et al
as 1:2012cv01135
Petitioner:
Stephen J. Gambino
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mavorkas and M. Frances Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McElhaney v. Attorney General et al
as 3:2009cv01474
Plaintiff:
Janet McElhaney
Defendant:
Attorney General, Dept of Homeland Security, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hussain v. Holmes et al
as 1:2009mc00004
Petitioner:
Mohammed Farhan Iqbal Hussain
Respondent:
Frances Holmes, Jonathan Scharfen, Janet Napolitano and others
Fedorov v. Dept of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Alexey Fedorov
Defendant:
Dept of Homeland Security, Michael Aytes, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shen v. Mukasey et al
as 6:2008mc06036
Petitioner:
Li Shen
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Curillo-Pena v. Homeland Security et al
as 3:2008cv00845
Plaintiff:
Diana Curillo-Pena
Defendant:
Homeland Security, Michael B. Mukasey, US Citizenship & Immigration Svc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramalingam v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00036
Plaintiff:
Jothilingam Ramalingam
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Paul E. Novak and others
Ghafarokhi v. Mukasey et al
as 3:2008cv00381
Plaintiff:
Zahra Nekouei Ghafarokhi
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mota Lopes v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008mc00021
Petitioner:
Jose E. Mota Lopes
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Robert S. Mueller, III, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Akindele v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008mc00019
Plaintiff:
Wabi Akindele
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
