Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Galyan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv06301
Defendant:
Rick Angelozzi, Corrections Health Partners, RN/LPN Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Galyan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Williams et al
as 3:2011cv00710
Defendant:
Greg Atkins, Brian Belleque, Lieutentant Dennis and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Thompson
as 3:2010cv01549
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Cleveland
Respondent:
Frank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Thompson et al
as 1:2009cv06198
Plaintiff:
James Russell Rogers
Defendant:
Frank Thompson, Etter, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv06186
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Max Williams, Stan Czernaik, SAIF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zastera v. Thompson
as 3:2008cv00434
Petitioner:
Jerry Lee Zastera
Respondent:
Frank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Howton et al
as 3:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Alexander
Defendant:
Nancy Howton, Frank Thompson, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knapp v. Thompson
as 3:2007cv01226
Petitioner:
Keylan Franklin Knapp
Respondent:
Frank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knapp v. Thompson
as 1:2007cv01229
Petitioner:
Keylan Franklin Knapp
Respondent:
Frank Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Ray
Defendant:
State of Oregon, State of Oregon, State of Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
