Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gatdet Chuol v. Scott Frakes, et al
as 16-3965
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gatdet G. Chuol
Respondent - Appellee:
Scott Frakes, Director and Fred Britten, Warden
Keith McDougald v. Robert P. Houston, et al
as 14-2221
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith McDougald
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert P. Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden, et al.
James Marrs v. Fred Britten, et al
as 13-3392
Petitioner - Appellant:
James D. Marrs
Respondent - Appellee:
Fred Britten, Warden and Houston, DCS Director
Herbert Campbell v. Fred Britten
as 13-2245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Defendant - Appellee:
Fred Britten, Warden
Michael Hernandez v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-2169
Petitioner:
Michael Anton Hernandez
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institute
Larry Thompson v. Nebraska Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 13-1752
Petitioner - Appellant:
Larry A. Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Nebraska Department of Corrections, Robert P. Houston, Director Department of Corrections and Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh State Corr. Inst.
Randy Harms v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-1577
Petitioner:
Randy R. Harms
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Correction, Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh Correctional Institution and Nebraska Attorney General John Brunning
Ernest Harper v. Robert Houston, et al
as 13-1001
Petitioner:
Ernest C. Harper
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections and Fred Britten, Warden, Tecumseh Correctional Institution
Dwight Tucker v. Robert Houston, et al
as 12-3916
Petitioner - Appellant:
Dwight L. Tucker
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director and Fred Britten, Warden
Herbert Campbell v. Fred Britten, et al
as 12-3258
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Fred Britten, Warden and Robert P. Houston, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
