Cases
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. San Bernardino Cnty et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00222
Defendant: Access Securepak, Aramac Canteen Corp, Aramac Canteen Corp and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
17: Doe
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. Carey Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00132
Defendant: Alverez, Alverez, City of San Bernardino of San Bernardino Cnty and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
SBPD: San Bernardino County Police Dept
Frederick Douglas Bennett v. California Via Calif Dept of Corrections & Rehab et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv02277
Defendant: Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. California Dept of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv01322
Defendant: Beaucaire, California Dept of Corrections, Carmicheal and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
Frederick Douglas Bennett et al v. Victorville Child Protective Services et al
as 5:2011cv00602
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr.
Defendant: Does, Victorville Child Protective Services and Victorville City
Bennett v. Winett et al
as 2:2008cv00836
Defendant: Winett and The Director of Corrections
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett v. Winett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00575
Defendant: Winett and The Director of Corrections
Plaintiff: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett v. California Board of Prison Terms et al
as 1:2008cv00376
Petitioner: Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr.
Respondent: California Board of Prison Terms and Michael E. Poulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?