Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Woodhull Freedom Foundation, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-5105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Woodhull Freedom Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Eric Koszyk and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Amicus Curiae:
Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics of Rhode Island, "COYOTE-RI", Black and Pink MA, The Community United for Safety and Protection and others
WOODHULL FREEDOM FOUNDATION et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01552
Defendant:
Attorney General JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, JESSE MALEY, WOODHULL FREEDOM FOUNDATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition v. W. Basham, et al
as 16-5047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition, (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism)
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Graylan Scott Hagler, Pastor, Plymouth Congregational Church, Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation and National Council of Arab Americans
Defendant - Appellee:
W. Ralph Basham, In official capacity as Director, U.S. Secret Service and Sally Jewell, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 12-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 12-7139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 08-7098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
