Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15952
Plaintiff:
RON G DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04554
Plaintiff:
HAROLD G DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pace v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Donald G. Davis, William J. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
Major Blitch, K. Knight, G. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Stevon L. Walker
Defendant:
W. Vazquez, G. Davis, Cantell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donovan Davis, Jr. v. USA
as 23-12420
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONOVAN G. DAVIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyre et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C.A. Tyre, J. Beighley, B. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Donovan G. Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Colette Peters, Warden Jason Gunther, Associate Warden Evelyn Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
