Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Stephanie Smith, et al v. Ronald Tyler, et al
as 24-5296
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE LOGSDON SMITH, et al. and BRIDGETT PARSON
Defendant:
RONALD R. TYLER, et al. and JONATHAN G. HALL
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Defendant:
G Hall, Stacy Richardson, Melvin Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hall v. Myotte, et al.
as 23-3896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY G. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BUDDY MYOTTE, ALVIN FODE, TRISDAN KOHUT and others
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stacy Hall v. Buddy Myotte, et al
as 23-35372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY G. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BUDDY MYOTTE, ALVIN FODE, TRISDAN KOHUT and others
Hall III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
William G Hall III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stacy Hall v. Buddy Myotte, et al
as 21-35603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY G. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BUDDY MYOTTE, ALVIN FODE, TRISDAN KOHUT and others
Anytime Bail Bonding, Inc. et al v. Taylor
as 1:2021cv00877
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor
Plaintiff:
Scott G. Hall, Anytime Bail Bonding of Gwinnett, Inc. and Anytime Bail Bonding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rotish Singh v. Sue Washburn, et al
as 21-35032
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CLARKE, Food Service Coordinator, S. SHELTON, Medical Director, A. SMITH, Physical Plant Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTISH VIKASH SINGH
Hall v. USA
as 4:2020cv01861
Petitioner:
Darnell G. Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
