Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Defendant:
G Hall, Stacy Richardson, Melvin Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hall v. Inch et al
as 5:2019ct03048
Defendant:
P.A. Shaw, Unit Manager Lesley, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Pierre Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregory G. Hall v. City of Clarksburg
as 16-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY G. HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLARKSBURG, a municipal Corporation and political subdivison, MARTIN G. HOWE, JAMES C. HUNT and others
Kenneth Watford v. Peter Goldman
as 14-7818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE WATFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER L. GOLDMAN, JUDGE WILLIAM CONNELLY, JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE and others
Watford v. Goldman et al
as 8:2014cv03105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watford
Defendant:
Peter L. Goldman, William Connelly, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. City of Clarksburg et al
as 1:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gregory G. Hall
Defendant:
City of Clarksburg, Martin G. Howe, James C. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32261
Plaintiff:
April G. Hall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall v. Hillen
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Hall
Defendant:
Walter R. Hillen
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Hall et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03277
Plaintiff:
Lisa G. Hall and John Hall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
