Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Donna Morgan LLC v. Saks, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07623
Plaintiff:
Donna Morgan LLC
Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc., Eminent Incorporated, Gap, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Empire Pawn of Nassau, Inc. v. Empire Gold & Pawn of Freeport, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04594
Defendant:
Ancor Gold Enterprises, Inc., Ancor Gold, Inc., Empire Gold & Pawn of CI Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Empire Pawn of Nassau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Gap, Inc. v. G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
as 12-830
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
The Gap, Inc. and Gap (Apparel) LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv06893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv06679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Gap, Inc. v. G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
as 11-3522
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
The Gap, Inc. and Gap (Apparel) LLC
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
The Gap, Inc. v. G.A.P Adventures Inc.
as 11-3171
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
The Gap, Inc. and Gap (Apparel) LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
G.A.P. Adventures Inc.
Lopez v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03185
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Lopez
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Gap International Sourcing, Inc., Old Navy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
