Cases filed in Michigan
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv10552
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
White v. KMart Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv11908
Plaintiff: Kimberly M White
Defendant: KMart Corporation, Sears, Roebuck & Co., Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Passmore v. GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
as 2:2010cv10665
Plaintiff: John W Passmore
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00487
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00655
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kulin v. GC Services, Limited Partnership
as 2:2008cv11894
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Kulin
Defendant: GC Services, Limited Partnership and GC Services, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Seay v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 2:2008cv11770
Plaintiff: Luke Seay
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv11532
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rambow v. GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
as 2:2008cv11531
Plaintiff: Craig Rambow and Craig Rambow
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware and GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wolfe v. GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv10628
Plaintiff: Martin Wolfe
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware and GC Services Limited Partnership-Delaware
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?