Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Olsen et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00972
Plaintiff:
Janae Olsen and Tim Armstrong
Defendant:
GEICO General Insurance Company and Berkshire Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Olsen et al v. GEICO General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv01610
Defendant:
Enlyte Group LLC, GEICO General Insurance Company, Berkshire Hathaway and others
Plaintiff:
Janae Olsen and Tim Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Jung, L.Ac. et al
as 3:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Kenny Jung, L.Ac., Sunny Jung, N.D., Accident Pain Wellness Clinic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 3:2014cv01777
Defendant:
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, American National Property and Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Carranza et al v. Geico General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv01932
Plaintiff:
Sabrina G. Carranza and Dallis Hughes
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Company and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
GEICO General Insurance Company v. United States of America
as 3:2007cv01862
Plaintiff:
GEICO General Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
