Cases 1 - 10 of 19
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CAHABA SAFEGUARD ADMINISTRATORS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
CAHABA SAFEGUARD ADMINISTRATORS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
KARNA, LLC and GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TRACE SYSTEMS INC. v. USA
as 1:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
TRACE SYSTEMS INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CACI, Inc.-Federal v. US
as 22-1488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CACI, INC.-FEDERAL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. and SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION
Ideal Innovations, Inc. v. US
as 20-2065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT KOCHER, THE RIGHT PROBLEM, LLC and IDEAL INNOVATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS, INC., GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS - FORCE PROTECTION, INC., FORCE PROTECTION, INC. and others
GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
UNISYS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
MORPHOTRUST USA, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
MORPHOTRUST USA, LLC and L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Thirdparty_defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. and HID GLOBAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
AM GENERAL, LLC v. USA
as 1:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
AM GENERAL, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
NAVY V GENERAL DYNAMICS C4
as 09-1550
Appellee:
General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.
Appellant:
Raymond E. Mabus, Secretary of the Navy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.