Cases 21 - 30 of 69
MCKINNEY v. FITZGERALD et al
as 3:2018cv12987
Defendant:
ROBERT CHERTERKIN, ANTHONY CAMPOS, OFFICER FORBES and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. SGT. WILKENS et al
as 2:2018cv12006
Defendant:
SGT. WILKENS, GEORGE ROBINSON, JOHN DOE (1) and others
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM MAURICE HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAINEY v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv10271
Petitioner:
MELVIN RAINEY
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BASKERVILLE v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv09873
Petitioner:
MARTIN LUTHER BASKERVILLE, JR.
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOLER v. ROBINSON
as 2:2018cv09748
Petitioner:
PEDRO SOLER
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv04547
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ULISSES M. RODRIGUEZ and JESSIE INEZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONS OFFICER MCGEE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BALTIMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv04755
Petitioner:
RONALD LONG
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv04260
Petitioner:
JULIUS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GEORGE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2018cv02512
Petitioner:
JAMES WOODS
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARTINEZ v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2018cv01493
Petitioner:
JOHN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
